The Industrial Revolution was the passport to the future. Innovation propelled our economies, technology, and transportation further than ever. Britain, the first country to ever enter the industrialist stage, set the tone for how capitalism would affect societies, economies, and the environments across the world. Unfortunately, as innovation and efficiency progressed, working conditions did not. As seen in the picture above, “hurriers” are one such example. 

“A hurrier, also sometimes called a coal drawer or coal thruster, was a child or woman employed by a collier to transport the coal that they had mined.” 

Coal mine managers strapped women and children to carts, like animals, and made them crawl through mine shafts for 12-hour shifts. These mines were incredibly hot, reaching over 100 degrees at times- workers never saw sunlight or breaks and had to hunch over for the entire workday. Jobs like these are textbook examples of the horrid conditions brought by the Industrial Revolution, especially for women and children working in factories or mines. 

Jobs like these continued for a long time. For almost 80 years (as the revolution started around 1760), women and children were subject to the worst of the worst. Generations would go by without much progress. Young lungs were filled with pollution leading to unhealthy lives and untimely deaths. Lives were like the unceasing, monotonous rhythms of the industrial machines. Hurriers saw no light at the end of their social tunnels- or in this case, mineshafts. 

The Factory Act of 1833 set age requirements for child labor. The British House of Commons declared that “children under the age of 9” could not work any longer. Individuals aged 10 through 17 were subject to more restrictions, working fewer hours and in better conditions. This seemed like a win in the social books but was not popular in the slightest. 

Sure, setting age requirements to work is great. In what world should a 4-year-old work in a coal mine? Children should be outside, exploring, learning, and having fun. They deserve a childhood just like everyone deserves a childhood. Setting age requirements for work is the first step towards getting them out of factories and into a normal life, right? 

Wrong.

In a normal working family, the children have to work because they have to. Believe it or not, children aren’t great left to their own devices. Usually, the wife of the family would look after the children during their newborn years, but for working families that isn’t possible: the wife needs to work, and if the wife works the child works too. Children, with this in mind, would work starting at ages 3 or 4. 

It’s a sad reality but it makes sense. The family is so poor they can’t afford to hire a nanny or watch over their children. (And yes, nannies existed back then- interestingly enough they can be dated back as early as 800 B.C!)

I digress. Because the working families needed their children to work, the Factory Act of 1833 received a lot of pushback. Women were forced to stay at home or the families were forced to hire nannies. Some families were driven to the depths of poverty- a majority of the family’s wage earners were forced to stay at home!

Then, the Coal Mines Act of 1842 came along- the second act on the way to reform. This prohibited children under the age of 10, who could fit in the tiny mineshafts, from working there. Women were also prohibited as part of this act: major protests came as a result.

It is important to note that social critiques reported on the conditions of the Industrial Revolution. These authors, writers, and early muckrakers convinced the British parliament to set restrictions for women and children. They believed that they could improve conditions for the country by improving the conditions for workers. 

Protests from women and children who were limited to work erupted- a paradoxical outcome. These women and children should be grateful: they don’t have to work in these horrible conditions, right?

Wrong. 

The women and children lost their money and paychecks. The government stepped in and took their money. Now their families will be driven to starvation- there’s no way to escape their social position besides picking up the most brutal of jobs. They were denied even that- they’re pissed, with every right to be. 

Reformers and parliament quickly realized the need for a solution for women and children. Women and children needed better lives but also needed to be productive. Women needed to make money while children needed a childhood. Possibly the most reasonable and ingenious solution to these problems was education- compulsory elementary education for children under the age of 18, funded by the state.

Acts up until 1870 provided education for the children of poor families, while women took the roles of teaching. Women who originally had lost their jobs in the mines could work in schools funded by the government. Children who originally had lost their jobs could be cared for by teachers at school, learning in the process. Families could get back on track all because of the new system of education. 

So this, finally, is the interesting reason why more women are schoolteachers. It all started in the Industrial Revolution- the innovation, factories, and working conditions then the critiques, acts, and protests all led up to the eventual creation of elementary education. Education acted as both an escape and outlet for women while giving children the childhood they deserved. To think this had historical roots doesn’t sound so crazy now, does it?